already within its normal capacity my computers, try to make some comments on the event held in Toluca, because I think it is of great historical importance that Mexico has hosted such an event.
Many complained that the information on the Internet was very bad, but I could not see for my problem with computers, but if I read an interview of one of the contributors to the Federation, which said everything was great, but as it may be something like "paid inclusion", you have to be cautious. Generally, competitors with whom I converse, no major complaints expressed about the organization of the event, only a few details such as lack of sufficient ballots (Apparently stole a whole box), but that was remedied in some way, some tardiness in the early rounds, mishandling of spaces for the top boards, no wall or projection boards of major items, etc., But nothing serious. But it seems that on the internet if there were many flaws. The side events that literally stayed and went unnoticed. The location designated for parents expect their children totally inappropriate, was sorry to see them in a small space and very uncomfortable. He must have foreseen something more appropriate to exploit your time is not wasted on a display or a video to be aimed at those who want to support their children, who did not, in his chess career and, importantly, how you can exploit a child's fondness for chess for Academic Achievement. But nothing, just some things were done to attract the attention of some, but in a place far from where the parents had to be to get their children to finish their games, so attendance was very low for some "lectures ". "Side events" were called ...
In general, it seemed to me, but when I expressed my opinion in favor of some competitors, I said "Everyone talks about the show as he was in it." Well, I really did well, with a performance of 2418, according to the "Chess results, I can not complain. 78% of my students had performances above 100 points on your rating, there was even one in the highest category, which had a performance of 180 more than its rating, which in that category is a total success. For me the most unfortunate is that the GM Manuel Leon had a performance slightly below its rating, which will cost about 7 valuable rating points, but sometimes not in good condition to play, as the table was that attracted more viewers and there was no fence to keep them a safe distance from player and sometimes inconvenience suffered by many people around.
Because of problems with my computer equipment I could not respond to requests for material in the event, so that all stakeholders are asked to do them reach me via email, as were reasons beyond my control. I would like to promote the vast amount of new material that I received in the last two weeks, but just such a huge flow was part of my problem for almost week and a half. But I will get a "Buccaneer" with information.
0 comments:
Post a Comment